Modified food Essay

Genetic solelyy Engineered foods, also k at a timen as GM and GMOs is the manipulation of DNA by compassionates to change the essential makeup of lay downs and animals. The technology inserts inheritable material from one species into other to give it a new quality, such as the ability to aver a pesticide, or to include genetic material from Bacillus Thuringiensis (Bt) a natural bacterium prove in soil. Mather R. The Threat From Genetically circumscribed Foods. have Earth News. April 2012. Web. 2 April 2013.Scientists lay down been undergoing experimentation of this order for over forty stratums, in hopes of perfecting GMs which they foresee will positively enhance the general well being of humanity nutritionally and environmentally. Jason McLure. Genetically Modified Food. CQ Researcher plus Archive trem conclusionous 31, 2012, Vol. 22 hold out 30 p1-35, p35 dickens techniques dominate the the GM farming industry Some rolls have been modify to be able to survive t he weed- killer glyphosate, commonly interchange under Monsantos Roundup brand.Roundup groom crops purpose is objection is to decrease the need to till before planting, saving farmers time and money and trim erosion and loss of soil moisture. Gylphosate is among the least toxic herbicides that can kill a broad spectrum of weeds, and olibanum is suppose to be safer for farmworkers and less environmentally damaging. The second technique is the introduction of genes from the soil bacterium Bacillis thurengiensis (Bt) produces a substance toxic to many pests but harmless to humans, wildlife and most beneficial insects, such as bees. season Bt has long been used by organic farmers, scientists have produced GM crops that manufacture their own Bt in the recess of the plant susceptible to attack from pests- such as clavus-plant roots prone to root- worm attack. Jason McLure. Genetically Modified Food. CQ Researcher sum Archive haughty 31, 2012, Vol. 22 Issue 30 p1-35, p35 What was o nce fairly guarded contention over the controversy of whether genetically engineered foods were safe or beneficial for human consumption and environmental preservation, has now spiraled into a social and political frenzy. People are now starting to demand for a food democracy.Currently, consistent negative findings of toxins, endangerment to human consumption, and environmental hazards have substantiated involving GMOs overturning the initial positive scientific and GM biotech producers projections. Government, FDA, GMO and GMO seed monopolizing company Monsanto have been accused of collaborating in order to keep GMOs understudied, in consumer markets, and un chaseed. GM manufactures claim that GMs are for the greater good of the world, stating that GM can end world hunger, stop climate change, reduce pesticide use, and addition crop yields. Smtih Jeffrey.Not In My Fridge. Ecologist November 2007, Vol. 37 Issue 9, p27-31, 5p If such a feat had been achieved, people would be rejoi cing, but evidence has proven contrary. The main disputable arguments are GM has not improved world hunger, GM has actually increased climate change, GM has doubled pesticide usage and now pest insects have developed an immunity to the pesticides, and GM has decreased crop yields. Smtih Jeffrey. Not In My Fridge. Ecologist November 2007, Vol. 37 Issue 9, p27-31, 5p GM is dangerous for human and animal consumption, and is an overall risk of exposure to our health and environment.Lab animals forced to eat GM foods showed damage to virtually every system studied. They had weedy growth, bleeding stomachs, abnormal and potentially pre- cancerous kiosk growth in the intestines, impaired blood cell development, misshapen cell structures in the liver-colored, pancreas and testicles, altered gene expression and ceil metabolism, liver and kidney lesions, partially atrophied livers, worsen kidneys, less developed brains and testicles, enlarged livers, pancreases and intestines, reduced d igestive enzymes, higher blood sugar levels, increased close rates, higher offspring mortality and immune system dysfunction. Smtih Jeffrey. Not In My Fridge. Ecologist November 2007, Vol. 37 Issue 9, p27-31, 5p Two dozen farmers reported that the GM corn varieties caused thousand of pigs to become sterile. Some also reported infertility among cows and bulls. German farmers link cow deaths to one variety of GM corn, while Filipinos link another variety to death among water buffaloes, chickens and horses. When 71 Indian shepherds let their sheep grace on Bt cotton plants later harvest, within 5 to 7 days 25 percent had died.The 2006 death rate for the region is estimated at 10,000 sheep. Since then more deaths were identified and toxins were also found in Bt cotton fields, investigators concluded that evidence strongly suggests the sheep death was caused by toxins, most probably Bt- toxin. Smtih Jeffrey. Not In My Fridge. Ecologist November 2007, Vol. 37 Issue 9, p27-31, 5p Th ree french scientists analyzed the raw data from three 2009 Monsanto studies on rats and found that three GM corn varieties caused liver and kidney toxicity and other kinds of organ damage.Mather R. The Threat From Genetically Modified Foods. Mother Earth News. April 2012. Web. 2 April 2013. organic fertilizer farmers fear that their non- GM crops could become contaminated by the spread of genetically modified traits by rear and insect cross-pollination. Once those traits are in the agricultural gene pool, in that locations no fashion to remove it. This is pollination with a life of its own, it spreads forever. Jason McLure. Genetically Modified Food. CQ Researcher Plus Archive August 31, 2012, Vol. 22 Issue 30 p1-35, p35.Another environmental concern is Roundup ends up in wetlands because of runoff and unintended spraying, and Roundup damages soil, according to Rick Relyea, University of Pittsburgh assistant Professor. Two Purdue scientists, Professor Emeritus Don Huber and G. s. Johal, said in a paper published in 2009 that the widespread use of glyphosate can significantly increase the adversity of various plant diseases, impair plant defenses to pathogens and disease, and immobilize soil and plant nutrients, rendering them unavailable for plant use.The pair warn that ignoring potential non- target side effects may have dire consequences for floriculture such as rendering the soil infertile, crops nonproductive and plants less nutritious. Mather R. The Threat From Genetically Modified Foods. Mother Earth News. April 2012. Web. 2 April 2013. In 1992, the first Bush Administration sped up the GM process hoping it would increase exports and US dominance of food markets. The opposite ensued and the US government spent up to 5-billion-taxpayer-dollars a year in subsidies to prop up prices on the GM crop that many countries at the time spurned to adopt.Following other countries refusal of GM, the US government went on to try and force other countries t o accept GM, resorting to ball Trade Organization Lawsuits against the European Union, GM food aid for famine- stricken nations, even threats to withdraw money for AIDS relief if GMOs werent adopted by African nations. Smtih Jeffrey. Not In My Fridge. Ecologist November 2007, Vol. 37 Issue 9, p27-31, 5p Monsanto and a few chemi- biotech companies ultimately control GMOs and GMO seed supply. Funding for university level question is often funded or controlled by the agrochemical companies.Biotech companies deny access to their patent-protected GM technology. Jason McLure. Genetically Modified Food. CQ Researcher Plus Archive August 31, 2012, Vol. 22 Issue 30 p1-35, p35 The FDA does not conduct self-governing testing for human or animal safety and relies strictly on the research conducted by the manufacturers of the products. While the main GMO producer, Monsanto, makes it unworkable for independent scientists to study GM seeds. The biotech industry has convinced the FDA that G M crops are not substantially assorted from conventional varieties. Mather R.The Threat From Genetically Modified Foods. Mother Earth News. April 2012. Web. 2 April 2013. As the system now stands, biotech companies bring their own research to the government body overseeing their products. Multibillion- dollar company corporations, including Monsanto and Syngenta, have restricted independent research on their genetically- engineered crops, they have refused to provide independent scientists with seeds, or theyve set restrictive conditions that severely point of accumulation research options, wrote Doug Gurian- Sherman of the Union of Concerned Scientists. Mather R. The Threat From Genetically Modified Foods. Mother Earth News. April 2012. Web. 2 April 2013. If GMOs fail, shareholders in Monsanto, Bayer, Syngenta and other companies will see their investments plummet. According to Yahoo Finance, more than 80 percent of Monsantos stock is held by institutional holders such a Vang uard and funds such as Davis, faithfulness and T Rowe Price. Mather R. The Threat From Genetically Modified Foods. Mother Earth News. April 2012. Web. 2 April 2013. FDA officials have openly criticized efforts to label GM crops and food.In 2002, when Oregon voters considered measure 27, with contributions totaling $1,480,000. Next was Dupont, with $634,000, said Cameron Woodworth in Biotech Family Secrets, a report for the Council for creditworthy Genetics. Biotech companies Syngenta, Dow AgroSciences, BASF and Bayer Crop Science, plus Grocery Manufacturers of America ( a trade organization), PepsiCo, General Mills and Nesde the States contributed $900,000, wrote Woodworth. Mather R. The Threat From Genetically Modified Foods. Mother Earth News. April 2012. Web. 2 April 2013.Labeling advocates, along with 40 other countries, including all of Europe, Japan, and China want any GM food to be labeled. Jason McLure. Genetically Modified Food. CQ Researcher Plus Archive August 31, 20 12, Vol. 22 Issue 30 p1-35, p35 Biotech companies claim that if GM products were labeled it would deter consumer spending, for by labeling GMOs consumers would deem such products defective. Other high-ranking government officials have lobbied against labeling, stating, If you label something theres an implication theres something wrong with it, said Jose Fernandez, the U.S. State Departments assistant escritoire for economic, energy and business affairs. Mather R. The Threat From Genetically Modified Foods. Mother Earth News. April 2012. Web. 2 April 2013.In bump into 2013, President Obama signed a rider which temporarily requires the market-gardening Department to approve the growing, harvesting and interchange of such crops, even if the courts rule environmental studies are incomplete. http//www. foxnews. com/politics/2013/03/30/obama-signs-bill-that-protects-makers-genetically-engineered-crops-from-federal/.Which prohibits the Department of Agriculture from stopping producti on of any genetically engineered crop once its in the ground, even if there is evidence that it is harmful. http//opinionator. blogs. nytimes. com/2013/04/02/why-do-g-m-o-s-need-protection/ The use of GM crops has become widespread among U. S growers of commodities, or big crops sold on future exchanges. Eighty- eight percent of corn and 94 percent of cotton, came from GM strains in 2012.Because corn and soy are ubiquitous in processed food in the U. S. , from corn- syrup- sweetened Coca- Cola to gaga made with soybean oil, its likely that most Americans consume a product containing a genetically modified ingredient everyday. Jason McLure. Genetically Modified Food. CQ Researcher Plus Archive August 31, 2012, Vol. 22 Issue 30 p1-35, p35 People should have the right and the choice to know exactly what they are ingesting and serving to their children and loved ones. tho label it.